Judgment in Darkness and Ambiguity is Always Incomplete: A Reflection on Taliban-Pakistan Relations
Amid ongoing clashes between the Pakistani military and Taliban militias along the Durand Line, the lack of clarity and transparency raises questions about the true nature of this conflict, which appears to be more about geopolitical maneuvering than a genuine war.

Kokcha News Agency – Reports of clashes between the Pakistani military and Taliban militias along the Durand Line have surfaced, but the exact locations remain unclear. In an era where documentation has become extremely accessible, the media has only shown a few seconds of military vehicles moving and sporadic gunfire in the dark night. Meanwhile, Pakistan has released images showing precision strikes on Taliban facilities, which have been confirmed by credible foreign sources. So far, the information available to the public is limited to these visuals and brief press releases from both Pakistan and the Taliban.
Why is it too early to judge?
- Taliban’s Need for an External Enemy: The Taliban, facing severe internal crises, need an external enemy to divert attention. Portraying Pakistan as an adversary helps them gain some credibility, but this is a short-lived strategy, like a paper fire that burns out quickly.
- Pakistan’s Need for Distraction: Similarly, Pakistan uses the threat of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) to divert its population from pressing economic and political issues. However, the educated Pashtun population in Pakistan is increasingly aware of their identity and political rights, making it harder for the state to control the narrative.
- The Role of the Pashtun Tribes: The former tribal areas, now part of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, have long been used as geopolitical pawns by Pakistan. However, the people of these regions now demand to be treated as equals rather than tools. The Taliban’s rise in Afghanistan has emboldened this sentiment, even though the Taliban’s ascent was orchestrated through a secretive deal involving the U.S. and Pakistan.
- The Evolving Definition of Terrorism: The global narrative on terrorism has shifted. When those once labeled as terrorists are welcomed in Western capitals, the term loses its meaning. Pakistan’s real crisis is not terrorism but deep-rooted separatism, which its current strategy cannot contain.
- Afghanistan’s Geopolitical Position: Afghanistan sits at the crossroads of several major economic corridors, including the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, India’s Chabahar project, and Central Asia’s transit routes. Each of these projects has its own security concerns, and the current situation in Afghanistan is not favorable to all stakeholders.
- The Taliban’s Limited Capacity: While the Taliban can wage guerrilla warfare, they lack the resources for a conventional war. Their current arsenal, supplied by external powers, is sufficient for internal suppression but not for sustained conflict with neighboring states.
- The Rise of Militant Groups: The militant groups once nurtured by Pakistan now operate independently and have found larger, more powerful patrons. This has shifted the balance of power in the region.
- The Fragility of the Taliban’s Rule: The Taliban’s rule is not sustainable. Their lack of legitimacy and reliance on suppression will inevitably lead to their downfall.
- The Need for National Representation: A clear national stance can only emerge from a functioning parliament and free media, both of which are absent in Afghanistan. Without these, any judgment on current events remains incomplete.
- The Taliban’s Self-Interest: The Taliban’s actions are driven by their own ideological and political interests, not the national interests of Afghanistan. Until the people of Afghanistan are included in the decision-making process, any judgment on the current situation will remain flawed.
The ongoing clashes between Pakistan and the Taliban along the Durand Line are shrouded in ambiguity, with both sides using the conflict to manipulate public perception. The Taliban’s rise has emboldened Pashtun identity politics, while Pakistan faces deep-rooted separatism. The situation is further complicated by Afghanistan’s strategic position in regional economic corridors. Until the people of Afghanistan are included in governance, any judgment on the conflict remains incomplete.











